Crowley Tanked

She has shown she is in the tank for the POTUS, in her actions relative to allowing leeway for him while limiting Romney in rebuttals. The clincher was at approx. 10:15 p.m. the two were in a verbal scrum and Crowly is heard telling Romney he is to sit back in his chair... 90 % of the debate subject was old news, waste of time.

Too bad she didn't have the jingles to start the debate with the one and only guy who asked about Libya. We need to remember she controlled the question content and order, and it is my opinion the only real important topic was diminished while being the most effective. Changed the POTUS's demeanor when his answer contained his first day response that Mitt stuck right back in his face. Crowley then tried to reframe and attempted to get Bamster out of the lie he had just said, so tell me she is not in the tank...

Overall, kinda of a crummy debate in that nothing new, old stuff, and the real important topic of Foreign policy started and ended in less than 5 minutes of the total debate. Very questionable question content choice in my view by the so called moderator.

Edited by PiratesAboard - 16 October 2012 at 10:41pm

Those of us who are going to vote against oweblamerliar and thus for Romney were not changed by this debate.

When the guy in the crowd said he was worse off than four years ago and wondered why he should vote for him again should have opened some eyes. I also noticed the one guy that looked straight down at the floor when Oblamer was two feet away. Respect? Not a chance.